On 5/15/06, Adrian Tarau <ady@daxtechnologies.com> wrote:
> I know the utility of JMX, I use it :) But right now I don't want to
> activate JMX. I saw that ActiveMQ use MX4J 2.1.1(why don't use 3.0.1?)
> and I have already in my application MX4J 3.0.1 libraries and I remember
> I used 3.0.1 with a project that need 2.1.x and was not working.
>
> And of course I cannot have two version of MX4J in my application.

In Java 5 it uses the JDK's JMX so there's no need to put any MX4J on
the classpath

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/