Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48442 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2007 07:38:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 07:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16116 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2007 07:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 16091 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2007 07:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 16082 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2007 07:38:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:38:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:38:17 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so729168ugc for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:37:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i8xwtP1HFK6x0ssVlZtaaZFlLHWvIo7LIO46ZZ52UonVKImTJC9TwqGwYD/Lu+tLLyDd38j0gh3joRk/5lJJE5yZqAJb6sQkg3zakmxKCg8fzGdaq34icph1TSCMwb7ni3ErFSI8aVHmLEGnZCktEd/ztketIsNQpYkBkdJF79s= Received: by 10.78.81.20 with SMTP id e20mr1178525hub.1171957076426; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:37:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.155.7 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:37:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:37:56 +0000 From: "James Strachan" To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Do I have to use Spring Framework to configure virtaul topic In-Reply-To: <9049576.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9044469.post@talk.nabble.com> <9049576.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/19/07, LiXiao2007 wrote: > > I read the documentation regarding the virtual topic. I understand the > consumers consume the messsages from the phisical queue tied to the virtual > topic. But one thing I am still not clear is wheter the consumers subscrible > the virutal topic or its phisical queues. The consumers subscribe to the queue (which is named by default to be similar named to the virtual topic as shown in the documentation). i.e. it is a queue for the consumer side, so you get all the usual queue benefits (load balancing, failover, concurrent consumption, message groups etc) -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/