Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <9109462.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:12:37 -0800 (PST)
From: spiderman2 <shawn.gandhi@bridgewatersystems.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Recover a failed Broker's Journal (by Database of Another Broker)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


I'm looking into clustered HA deployments with zero message loss under one
point-of-failure.

My best options seem to be:
  A) Network of Brokers with fast journaling and jdbc persistance
  B) JDBC Master Slave

BUT, what if broker dies before it writes its batch to the database, but
after it completes its fast-journal?

Is there a way that:
A) another broker in the network can pick up its journal data?
B) the slave broker can pick up its journal data?


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Recover-a-failed-Broker%27s-Journal-%28by-Database-of-Another-Broker%29-tf3275595s2354.html#a9109462
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.