activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From drvillo <f.viv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Spam: 5.0] AMQ 4.2 status
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:45:14 GMT

Rob

thanks for the quick reply

will you announce when you branch 4.1 and 5?
Do you have any estimate of when this is likely to happen?

Cheers
Francesco


James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> Given that a few things have changed in 4.2.x we'll be renaming that
> 5.0 as the OpenWire protocol will be enhanced, the code will move to
> Java 5 and other things are changing (such as dispatching, spool to
> disk stuff and so forth).
> 
> So if you can wait a month or so, I'd go with 5.0, otherwise go for a
> 4.1.x release which should all be binary compatible with each other.
> 
> 
> On 2/23/07, drvillo <f.vivoli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob
>>
>> the service is announced here:
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/hostcount/hostcount++/
>>
>> background here:
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/hostcount/
>>
>> What I'm interested mainly in a new release is the stability
>> of Kaha (I've just posted on this).
>> Java 5 would be nice to have, but it's quite more important
>> for example that interfaces don't change between 4.1 and 4.2,
>> there's no point in releasing a long running service which will
>> already have binary incompatibilities next month...
>>
>> thanks for the reply anyway, I would just like to know which
>> moves to take.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>> rajdavies wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Francesco,
>> >
>> > just out interest what's the service you're releasing?
>> >
>> > We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version
>> > of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk,
>> > with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> >
>> > Rob Davies
>> > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service.
>> >> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released
>> >> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release
>> >> with
>> >> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a
>> >> month old
>> >> trunk rev.)
>> >> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory
>> >> - and to get rid of this  backport-util-concurrent.jar
>> >>
>> >> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how
>> >> about the quality of the codebase?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations
>> >> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each
>> >> checkout:)
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Francesco
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-
>> >> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227
>> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117116
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117428
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message