activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From spiderman2 <shawn.gan...@bridgewatersystems.com>
Subject Re: High Availability and Network Of Brokers
Date Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:49:25 GMT

But I'm concerned with respect to scalability. I'm assuming the Network of
Brokers was created such that the deployment could scale to a large number
of consumers. What kind of scalability issues/limits will I have with a
Master/Slave scenario?

Thanks!

Shawn



James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> Yes, Master/Slave is the answer for high availability and to avoid
> message loss if a broker dies.
> 
> 
> On 2/7/07, spiderman2 <shawn.gandhi@bridgewatersystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a New user. I'd like to use activemq for a Network Of Brokers /
>> Clustered deployment. The catch is that I can't afford to loose a single
>> message in the event of failure.
>>
>> In the Network of Brokers topology, I'm reading this isn't possible:
>>
>> "At any point in time the message will only exist in one broker's store
>> at
>> once until its consumed. In the future we will support high availability
>> brokers using a master-slave protocol where we willl replicate a message
>> on
>> to a number of slave brokers for hot standby if the master broker were to
>> be
>> unavailable for a certain period of time."
>> http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-distributed-queues-work.html
>> http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-distributed-queues-work.html
>>
>>
>> Today, is there a way to have High availability with a clustered
>> approach?
>> Should I just use a Master/Slave instead?
>>
>>
>> Shawn
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/High-Availability-and-Network-Of-Brokers-tf3189661s2354.html#a8854295
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/High-Availability-and-Network-Of-Brokers-tf3189661s2354.html#a8866669
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message