Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 209.85.132.251 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of james.strachan@gmail.com)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=glPcEfPsAtzblB2A5mM5xvjT/LE4yYZA0ukxFNLO/DU6mXYD1EguFQI6wbw74Xwkc+4/Ii3OUlKF7DvT2X/TGBtDyY9yODhFRF5BUk2YDas+scZ9wNWhiDV03VkunTwng0pkwkdyu01m6HBEGGlT4bmwh7j9qaEvhKAGFcDmxOY=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0612070859o7e95d907n60a689fc7cbbabfc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:59:40 +0000
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccessible Messages in Queue
In-Reply-To: 
 <OF53C34172.FD668668-ON8525723C.006F64D8-8525723C.0071AEAA@jpmchase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: 
 <OF53C34172.FD668668-ON8525723C.006F64D8-8525723C.0071AEAA@jpmchase.com>

Yes I've seen this before - its a bug in the dispatch logic. It was
fixed in 4.1.0.

On 12/6/06, tony.x.rippy@jpmchase.com <tony.x.rippy@jpmchase.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm seeing a strange issue with ActiveMQ 4.0.2. We have a single process
> that generates messages and sends them to a queue. There are several
> hundred client processes that consume messages from this queue. I have set
> the queue prefetch policy of the client connections to 1,
> useRetroactiveConsumer = true, maxInactivityDuration = 0. I'm using a
> non-transacted auto-acknowledge session with the MessageConsumer.
>
> Every now and then we get what appears to be a "lost" message. The clients
> are unable to pull any more messages off the queue, but JConsole/JMX is
> reporting that there is 1 message still available. Using the browseAsTable
> operation I'm able to inspect the message, but nothing seems out of the
> ordinary.
>
> Has anyone seen a situation like this before? Any suggestions of what I
> could do to prevent this from happening?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Tony
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
> use of the information contained herein (including any reliance
> thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  Although this transmission and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
> ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by
> JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as
> applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
> If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
> contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety,
> whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/