Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=PszTh4GHdgaH3anN6ZSa1U5mPRbpVGGibsP4TZ4/Ne+9xX3o3O4ndu0iccXEYGzs3dLFZhuEnRtJmn9pqXSL9H9WFpABZwfZUN2fvRRORfUssPcFgvqXR0LH3hG5CvZ5FFVJwj0VU5LnpXdN50Y7j2MfIt//yrgQPg3gwxi1drI=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <8088939.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <8088939.post@talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <91734455-FE52-485D-9FF7-4BA0FAAC2DED@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kaha persistance and memory usage
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:17:52 +0000
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org

In 4.0.2 the index for messages was held in memory in Kaha - this is  
not the case in later releases - please try http://www.activemq.org/ 
site/activemq-410-release.html

cheers,

Rob

On 29 Dec 2006, at 16:06, Danielius Jurna wrote:

>
> Hi.
>
> Currently I'm evaluating kaha persistance and I have few questions.
> 1. It seems that flow management for fast producers doesn't work  
> (it may be
> normal due to different persistance nature comparing to journaled  
> store)
> 2. It seems that index for messages is held in memory, so broker  
> can endup
> whith OutOfMemoryException on slow consumers.
>
> I was testing kaha which comes whith AMQ 4.0.2. Messages were sent  
> to queues
> without transactions.
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kaha- 
> persistance-and-memory-usage-tf2895222.html#a8088939
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>