Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78451 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2006 16:07:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 2006 16:07:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 91981 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2006 16:07:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91965 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2006 16:07:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91945 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2006 16:07:06 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:07:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:06:55 -0800 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0KFf-0004as-CJ for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:06:35 -0800 Message-ID: <8088939.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:06:35 -0800 (PST) From: Danielius Jurna To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Kaha persistance and memory usage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: danielius@elitnet.lt X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi. Currently I'm evaluating kaha persistance and I have few questions. 1. It seems that flow management for fast producers doesn't work (it may be normal due to different persistance nature comparing to journaled store) 2. It seems that index for messages is held in memory, so broker can endup whith OutOfMemoryException on slow consumers. I was testing kaha which comes whith AMQ 4.0.2. Messages were sent to queues without transactions. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Kaha-persistance-and-memory-usage-tf2895222.html#a8088939 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.