Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14776 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 20:17:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 20:17:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 79821 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2006 20:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79799 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2006 20:17:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 79788 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2006 20:17:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:17:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:17:32 -0800 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtV6l-0002oq-AY for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:17:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7785553.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:17:11 -0800 (PST) From: "alexandre.correa" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Oracle JDBC persistence In-Reply-To: <7785022.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: alexandre.correa+nabble@gmail.com References: <7785022.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry guys, I've been thinking this was an Oracle problem. But reading this post (http://www.nabble.com/DB-connection-pool-tf2775515.html) I've concluded it is not. Following the suggested workaround I've got to solve my problem. Sorry for bothering you, Alexandre -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Oracle-JDBC-persistence-tf2790329.html#a7785553 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.