Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15878 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2006 13:34:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2006 13:34:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 70551 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 13:34:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70350 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 13:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70337 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2006 13:34:09 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:34:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:33:57 -0800 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrDwv-0004V0-0w for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:33:37 -0800 Message-ID: <7677083.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:33:36 -0800 (PST) From: chago To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: ajax request/response support In-Reply-To: <5644704.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: nabble@visualxs.com References: <5644704.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I second this request. Does someone already have this on their plate? -- jim Edwin Park wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd love to see support for efficient request/response (a la > http://www.activemq.org/site/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html) > via the amq ajax mechanism, something like: > > amq.request(responseHandler, message) > > Are there any plans to implement this? > > Thanks, > Ed > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ajax-request-response-support-tf2049307.html#a7677083 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.