From activemq-users-return-6189-apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Mon Dec 11 06:07:15 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60616 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2006 06:07:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 06:07:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87909 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2006 06:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87889 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2006 06:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87880 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2006 06:07:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:07:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:07:11 -0800 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GteJP-00057P-9t for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:06:51 -0800 Message-ID: <7790142.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:06:51 -0800 (PST) From: Anthrope To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: JDBC Master Slave MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: pn@anthrope.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I'm using version 4.1 and am trying to get a fairly straightforward jdbc master-slave setup going. I'm using a minimal configuration, with the default JDBC persistence adaptor, as specified in this example: http://www.activemq.org/site/jdbc-master-slave.html . I start the master instance first, and attempt to start the slave with the *same* configuration file. The slave fails to start, because it attempts to create the derby database as well. Now, the documentation states this: in regard to JDBC master slave configuration: "By default if you use the to avoid the high performance journal you will be using JDBC Master Slave by default. You just need to run more than one broker and point the client side URIs to them to get master/slave." The behaviour I see is not quite consistent with this. I am not able to start more than one broker, which is the master. Am I missing something here? And, has anyone got this to work? I am attaching the broker configuration file, which is a verbatim cut and paste of the xml configuration file in the JDBC master slave example. http://www.nabble.com/file/4543/m.xml m.xml Regards, Prashanth -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-tf2792225.html#a7790142 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.