activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A Question About Message Groups
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:11:27 GMT
It should go to the head - but its worth writing a unit test to check
thats the case :)

On 12/6/06, osian <osian@osian.me.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Another question has cropped up, if, lets say, the consumer were to go down
> whilst processing a message, does the message it was processing go to the
> back of the queue, or remain as the fist to get handed out to the next
> consumer that is available?  (the consumers are using auto acknowledge),
>
> Thanks,
> Osh
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > On 12/6/06, osian <osian@osian.me.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> When using message groups (within 4.1), is there any way of guaranteing
> >> the
> >> order in which the messages, within a group, are processed by the single
> >> consumer? i.e. is there any way of setting a sequence on a message, and
> >> ensuring that it is processed in the order of 1,2,3,4 etc, or even 1,2,4
> >> (if
> >> there is no 3 for a message group within ActiveMQ)?
> >
> > The messages are processed in the order in which they are sent to the
> > broker; so no need to explicitly number them.
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-Question-About-Message-Groups-tf2766866.html#a7720860
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message