Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53057 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2006 15:31:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2006 15:31:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 81556 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2006 15:31:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81542 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2006 15:31:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81524 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2006 15:31:25 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:31:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:31:10 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l23so492020nfc for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:30:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FJ7Jo+xHfqRQ8tojXoLdJ1I8S/yjg8yYd3wJjBKDnBzLLbCHPIcErF9qqFhm6nkW14k3MOt0YxWXImCJFpqWwETNvc8lE/2DLQuUrPMxg2Ps2NvKDdbbEuKMmDMr90DefCZn52OADG9aw8D5jONHEvVzDTDbHZYKrPwJpR7hUGY= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr122294buc.1163431849221; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.147.16 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:30:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:30:48 +0000 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Why use ActiveMQ over JBossMQ? In-Reply-To: <7300607.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7300607.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/12/06, monocongo wrote: > > I am starting a new project which will involve asynchronous messaging and my > manager wants to use vanilla JMS and JBossMQ. I have used MDBs with JBossAS > and JMS QueueSender/MessageListener with JBossMQ before, and now that I'm > familiar with (some parts of) Spring I'd like to go the Spring JMS /ActiveMQ > route instead, if it makes sense, and I suspect it does. If anyone can > provide me with some information or point me to any references which would > help me make my case I'd certainly appreciate it. Thanks in advance! More background here... http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html there are two completely separate decisions to make; whether you want to use a J2EE container and MDBs - or whether you want to use just Spring; then there's the decision on which JMS provider you want to use. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/