Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71849 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 19:33:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 19:33:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 38391 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2006 19:33:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38372 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2006 19:33:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 38363 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2006 19:33:49 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:33:49 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:33:35 -0800 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GmEtG-0002gs-KY for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:33:14 -0800 Message-ID: <7448942.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:33:14 -0800 (PST) From: "massive.boisson" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Object Message In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: massive.boisson@gmail.com References: <7441481.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, I'll use Seriliazation. I got it to work, I'd rather not say what I did wrong, I don't think there is any chance someone else will do that :) Thanks. James.Strachan wrote: > > On 11/20/06, massive.boisson wrote: >> 2. I am getting NotSerializableException no matter what I try. My object >> is >> implementing Serializable, I even tried with String for test. I have a >> remove broker listening to tcp connections. Any ideas? > > No - got a test case? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Object-Message-tf2668658.html#a7448942 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.