Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of nathan.mittler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.192 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=EBMuTPZzebeX/SvjmeYdep7/oDiHRYKeLznabB+7Gmfw1fXxx2EH9JJs2YaSJiHQPRTLPUPBi8e7BiSUnRNsCCo4/OvF5guox6OFrNgBhEidmgn73gBmbqZsV4nhr51UkMzv3Jys8tfbuIXSeZKxRdVXDVASceTvTAiTckZt4BU=
Message-ID: <8a6feb940610280552v5dd044c3t163cb052ba6fc677@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:52:22 -0400
From: "Nathan Mittler" <nathan.mittler@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions ActiveMQ C++ Client
In-Reply-To: <af2843cd0610271211k180d73d0tfe80249153ddf151@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_110356_14641107.1162039942915"
References: <7022558.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <af2843cd0610271211k180d73d0tfe80249153ddf151@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_110356_14641107.1162039942915
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

We've been using gcc 4.x, which hasn't shown that warning - I'll take a
look.  But yes - the support for the stomp protocol is mature at this point
in activemq-cpp.  Of course, development is always going on - our main focus
now is adding support for other wire protocols, specifically openwire.

Regards,
Nate

On 10/27/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> That can be easily fixed.  Not all compilers give out the same warnings.
>
> activemq-cpp is very stable and should be nearing a stable release
> shortly.
>
> On 10/26/06, rnelson <rob.nelson@irisfinancial.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > I am wondering who has used the ActiveMQ C++ client.  I am using it
> under
> > 4.0.2.  It seems to work fine, but there is one question I have:
> >
> > Under Windows, the following warning gets printed out:
> >
> > c:\ActiveMQ\activemq\connector\stomp\commands\AckCommand.h(102) :
> warning
> > C4390: ';' : empty controlled statement found;
> >
> > Looking at the source code, this is the case.
> >
> > My general question is how new the C++ client code is, and if is still
> being
> > written, or whether it is in a state that is generally considered
> robust?
> > Any insights on its use would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rob Nelson
> > rob.nelson@irisfinancial.com
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-ActiveMQ-C%2B%2B-Client-tf2517793.html#a7022558
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>

------=_Part_110356_14641107.1162039942915--