Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of nathan.mittler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=IFcu0I8UFhfc/tQzs9+JV1Rsbmi+Pme4jbejy9ocUSym309eLTNHTI3CzcF6DT6DVpQ4viTpkDj3Yxg/nA4RQupJUwBLOKPErPSp3tr869vUF5oJTAhC5SI0H71rxZTmkyk8aA7jjxLmiCLonrmV29GDTGPWQ777usu9l+O7Hbs=
Message-ID: <8a6feb940610101321t330218bfv73a1a936dd821817@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:21:05 -0400
From: "Nathan Mittler" <nathan.mittler@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: release for activemq
In-Reply-To: <6742694.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_55209_24649895.1160511665158"
References: 
 <5A211522579EBD4A83155ED7FA153063013B62C9@corpatsmail1.corp.sensis.com>
	 <6742694.post@talk.nabble.com>

------=_Part_55209_24649895.1160511665158
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Please make the distinction between ActiveMQ and the activemq-cpp client.
ActiveMQ has a long history with several releases:
http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html

The activemq-cpp client is a separate subproject that is still somewhat in
its infancy, but is gaining steam.  We've just had some discussion on
creating a first release, but as of right now we don't have any dates yet
... will post when we have a better picture of when this might happen.

Regards,
Nate

On 10/10/06, Martin Goulet <Martin.Goulet@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> I work with Lalit at SunGard and we are using ActiveMQ as part of our
> reference implementation for our company wide software architecture. One
> thing that is bugging us quite a bit is the fact that there is no release
> out for activeMQ. When do you think it would be possible to have such a
> release?
>
> Thx!
>
> MG
> --
> Martin Goulet, B.Sc. =95 Vice-President, Java Architecture, CSA =95 SunGa=
rd
> martin.goulet@sungard.com =95 www.sungard.com/csa
>
>
>
> tabish121 wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Tim-
> >>
> >> In that case just wanted to know that
> >> a) Is their a official release planned for the broker
> >
> > The Broker has official releases already.  They can be found here
> > http://www.activemq.org/site/download.html
> >
> > The Activemq-cpp does not have an official release currently, we have
> > been discussing this and hope to have one soon.  No timeline is
> > currently available however.
> >
> >> b) Which company do you work for and what is the proj about (in case u
> > can
> >> tell me ....)
> >
> > I work for Sensis Corp.  http://www.sensis.com/
> >
> > We use AMQ Cpp to provide a high volume message bus for radar data
> > processing.  Nate may chime in on this if he feels he can share anythin=
g
> > that wouldn't violate any company proprietary info as he is working on
> > that project.
> >
> >> c) We had a big plan for activemq-cpp .... wanted to create a service
> > bus
> >> ... activemq-cpp could go in as a reference implementation for our
> > product
> >> .... we would provide support for 4 diff techs for consumers. What
> > kind of
> >> support can we expect Tim.
> >>
> >
> > Those of us working on amq-cpp do so on a volunteer basis; we aren't
> > paid to do so.  As such we support it as best we can.  You are welcome
> > to contribute to the project or write issues for bugs that you find and
> > we will get to them as fast as we can.
> >
> >> Hey Tim, please reply to me ... I want to promote this in our org.
> >
> > I am on travel this week, so responses are delayed a bit, so no need to
> > send multiple messages.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Lalit Nagpal
> >>
> >>
> >> tabish121 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > # Lalit Nagpal # wrote:
> >> >> Hi
> >> >>
> >> >> If somebody could help me with these questions, I would be able to
> >> > convince
> >> >> my managers on using activemq.
> >> >>
> >> >> Q1. We wanted to know whether their are any plans for an official
> >> > release of
> >> >> activemq (with c++).
> >> >>
> >> > We don't currently do official releases of the activemq-cpp code,
> > once
> >> > we do it would still not be included with the broker.  Activemq-cpp
> > is
> >> > separate from the broker.
> >> >
> >> >> Q2. Is activemq-cpp api being used in production anywhere. Any
> >> > examples of
> >> >> active usage would definitely help me convince my managers.
> >> >>
> >> > Its currently being used by the company I work for.  We aren't aware
> > yet
> >> > who all is using it besides us, we welcome people to report back how
> > its
> >> > working for them.
> >> >
> >> >> Q3. Any stats on efficiency would be '+' for me to know about
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > There is some performance data on the ActiveMQ site for the broker.
> > We
> >> > don't currently have any performance data for the cpp client readily
> >> > available.
> >> >
> >> >> Please help me with these questions so that I can promote
> > activemq-cpp
> >> >> within my organization
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Lalit Nagpal
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/release-for-activemq-
> >> tf2410816.html#a6730280
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-release-for-activemq-tf2417364.html#a6742694
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

------=_Part_55209_24649895.1160511665158--