Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74182 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2006 14:21:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2006 14:21:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 46804 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2006 14:21:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46783 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2006 14:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46774 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2006 14:21:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:21:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:21:45 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GaYlw-0004xO-Ob for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:21:24 -0700 Message-ID: <6897789.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:21:24 -0700 (PDT) From: sileshi To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug AMQ-978:No message exchange between Java JMS and Perl Stomp clie In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sileshikassa@yahoo.com References: <6880693.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm still using 4.0. Is 4.0.2 stable? or should I try 4.0.1? -Sileshi Hiram Chirino wrote: > > Have you tried it against a 4.0.1 or 4.0.2-SNAPSHOT > 4.0 had some known STOMP problems. > > On 10/18/06, sileshi wrote: >> >> >> I have recently discovered a problem with ActiveMQ when attempting to >> exchange messages between Java JMS and Perl Stomp clients. No Message >> gets delivered from one side to the other. >> >> According to James Strachan of ActiveMQ team, there is no >> architectural/design >> limitation to do those sort of message sending. He said that there is no >> difference between a message sent by Stomp, JMS, REST, or Ajax. Thus, a >> messge sent from any of the connector's clients, should be delievered to >> any destination consumer. This is very reassuring. >> >> I have opened a bug report AMQ-978. I will ask other users if they run >> into similar problem either Perl Stomp - Java JMS, or any other >> combination, >> please update this thread with info. >> >> -Sileshi >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Bug-AMQ-978%3ANo-message-exchange-between-Java-JMS-and-Perl-Stomp-clients-tf2467960.html#a6880693 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bug-AMQ-978%3ANo-message-exchange-between-Java-JMS-and-Perl-Stomp-clients-tf2467960.html#a6897789 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.