activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <>
Subject Re: NMS problem
Date Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:53:47 GMT
On 10/18/06, robottaway <> wrote:
> Sorry James I am just a picky guy :) I know I won't need to do multiple
> connections quickly but I was just pointing it out (and wondering why it
> takes so long to connect with NMS). Is there a way to speed up the
> connection process? With STOMP or the normal JMS AMQ connections are fast.
> Is the protocol in C# just heavier? Or is it C# itself is causing the
> slowness.

The NMS cilent should be equivalent to the Java JMS client in terms of
its operations.

FWIW we just changed message acknowledgement to be asynchronous like
the Java client and fixed a couple of bugs with NMS.

> Also would you have an suggestions on my problem with 4.0.1 vs. 4.0.2. 4.0.1
> does not seem to work with the head revision of the C# NMS client. So I will
> need to use AMQ 4.0.2. I am using Servicemix to route data between services
> right now, which relies on AMQ 4.0.1. Could I run a separate instance of AMQ
> 4.0.2 and bridge it to the 4.0.1 instance running in Servicemix? Would this
> be stable/robust/doable for a good size volume of messages?

We should be able to do a release of servicemix with 4.0.2 very soon.
Then again when 4.1 is out :)



View raw message