activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NMS problem
Date Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:22:59 GMT
Am not sure why you seem to be experiencing slowness. Note that with
NMS, CMS and JMS you are meant to create connections, sessions,
producers & consumers on startup, so that things are very fast for
processing individual messages.

http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-do-i-use-jms-efficiently.html

On 10/18/06, robottaway <rottaway@musiciansfriend.com> wrote:
>
> I checked out the preview release of 4.0.2 and installed it. After running it
> I was able to connect using the newest version of the NMS AMQ client!!! But
> I have a couple of gripes.
>
> First the Servicemix install I am using right now does not ship with a
> version of AMQ that works with the NMS client.
>
> Second it does not seem very fast to connect and send a message. Compared to
> using the Ruby STOMP client to send messages it seems downright slow.
>
> I would like to use the C# client in a very cool project here at work. We
> are implementing a bunch of business processes in an application called
> Axapta. This is a M$ app. I will be able to use the C# client in this
> application so that we can message with our AMQ instance in our Servicemix
> bus. It would be awsome to have the ability to message in Axapta. Right now
> we can do web services and flat files, and external database (but really
> slow).
>
> Any ideas out there on what I could do. Would it make sense to run AMQ 4.0.2
> separate from Servicemix (3.0 release)? I think that I wan't to use the NMS
> client rather than the STOMP in Axapta.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NMS-problem-tf2462906.html#a6867337
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message