activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Issues with stomp
Date Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:40:45 GMT
FWIW you can increase the usageManager setting in the activemq.xml to
give ActiveMQ more RAM to work with, which will delay the issue you're
seeing. BTW are you using persistent or non persistent messaging?

On 10/14/06, snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > thanks for the info.  Please bear with it - I'm not sure the issue is
> > so much with Stomp  but with ActiveMQ's ability to handle large
> > volumes of messages that haven't been consumed. This is something I'
> > ve been working on improving for a while - and it should be ready end
> > of next week.
>
> That makes sense.  So far I've narrowed it down to two specific
> scenarios where things start to go crazy.  One is when a stomp
> consumer disconnects badly, and the other is when too many messages
> are in the queue, somewhere around 20,000 or so from what I've seen.
> If I just have a consumer constantly reading anything put into the
> queue I can send stuff for days and it works fine without any jumps in
> memory consumption.  Also, when it does start eating memory messages
> can't be consumed and disconnected consumers still hang around, but I
> can still put messages into the queue.  But you probably already knew
> that..
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message