activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Failover Advice
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:50:20 GMT
:)

So yes the URL you use at the end sounds line to me. Run 2 brokers if
you like, otherwise just use failver: on the one broker (so that
bad/hung TCP connections get recreated).

On 10/3/06, Charles Anthony <charles.anthony@hpdsoftware.com> wrote:
> I'm looking for some advice, please, on possible failover approaches.
>
> We have a single standalone ActiveMQ Broker, and both application
> clients and an application servers connective to the broker via tcp.
> The messages are non-persistent, and we have persitence turned off on
> the ActiveMQ Broker.
>
> The application server actually resides on the same server as the
> ActiveMQ server; the clients are coming in over a VPN connection.
>
> We have two internet lines coming in - and sometimes we need to swap
> lines, due to routing problems. Our IT chaps tinker away with some
> VPN/router settings, and hey presto, the TCP traffic is rerouted over
> the other line.
>
> Sometimes, though not always, it seems this causes the TCP Connections
> to ActiveMQ to hang (sometimes they go to TCP_WAIT states).
>
> Now, obviously I'd rather the connections didn't go belly up - but
> anecodotally (i.e. through observation, not through proof) they do
> occasionally do this.
>
> How can I set up a fail over scenario here ? Our broker, and all the
> clietns and servers are configured using URLs; the Broker currently
> listens on
>
> tcp://localhost:61616
>
> The application server connections to the same url
> (tcp://localhost:61616)
> The clients connect using a dns-resolved name,
> (tcp://examplemachine.host.com:61616)
>
> I'm actually not bothered if existing messages get lost - what I don't
> want to do is restart my application server, because we have some
> lengthy initialisation logic which can take up to half an hour.
>
> Would this work (yes, I know I should just try it - but SHOULD this
> work) :
>
> configure two separate ActiveMQ Brokers on the same machine
>
> Broker 1 tcp://localhost:61616
> Broker 2 tcp://localhost:61700
>
> Configure the clients/application server to use a  failover URL :
> failover://(tcp://examplemachine.host.com:61616,tcp://examplemachine.hos
> t.com:61616)?randomize=false
>
> Would that make any sense ?
>
> We're using a snapshopt of ActiveMQ 4.0 from May.
>
> Excuse the hurried email that probably doesn't make a great deal of
> sense; disgruntled clients are applying pressure...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles.
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message