I think I'd actually prefer a protocol id that looks something like this:
stomp+ssl://
On 10/18/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/18/06, oferhalevi <ofer.halevi@intuwave.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas on how to add transport level security to
> the
> > Stomp connector?
> > Is it down to configuration, or is this feature simply not available
> (yet)?
>
> Its more a case of we've never tried yet. From the Java server side of
> the fence it should be fairly simple to provide a stompssl transport
> which reuses the ssl transport but uses the stomp wire format.
>
> I wonder if there's a stomp client we can experiment with on the SSL
> side of things? Maybe the ruby client?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
|