activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hayden, Charles \(Charles\)" <>
Subject RE: durable subscriptons
Date Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:50:35 GMT
I don't have any problem doing this, but I hesitate for the following
1.  I know next to nothing about this.  I have been using activemq and
stomp for all of three days, and have no recent java experience.  I was
just trying to make the sample program work.
2.  Although (1) should stop me, I am foolhardy enough to press on.
However, I am not sure whether it is a good idea to change the parameter
name at this time.  If I correct the spelling, then existing stomp
clients will break (implementations in each language have to be
changed).  Furthermore, to the extent that stomp is used to communicate
between servers, this change will mean the new servers cannot
interoperate with old ones.  I just don't have the perspective to make
this kind of decision.
By the way, I believe the ConsumerInfo class is where the typo is.

I will change the wiki to describe the current state of affairs and let
those more knowledgeable fix the real problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Hiram
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: durable subscriptons

doh!  send us a patch and edit the wiki!  Lets make it right :)

On 10/19/06, Hayden, Charles (Charles) <> wrote:
> Is there a reason that the header field for durable subscriptions in
> Stomp is spelled subcriptionName rather than the more intuitive
> subscriptionName?  The web page describing how to use this
> ( mentions this field three times,
> spelled three different ways, none of them the way it is spelled in
> code.



View raw message