activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jamie McCrindle" <jamiemccrin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: surprising performance tuning result with activemq 4.0.1
Date Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:24:22 GMT
in the test, yes it is. would the journal and sqlserver be queing behind
each other for io?

On 10/11/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/06, Jamie McCrindle <jamiemccrindle@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > The database we're using is SQL Server 2005. The messaging we're doing
> > tends to be relatively slow, i.e. about 40 messages per second off a
> > number of durable queues. Two of the queues are exclusive consumers.
>
> I wonder, was the journal on the same disk as is being used by SQL Server?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message