Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <6532492.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: me9999 <m@wwcw.org>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dispatch Policy and Message Groups
In-Reply-To: <ec6e67fd0609270821r37a03fb9gba9cdd00224d4e2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6519623.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <ec6e67fd0609262319l3c251954g63108594d54f6ac6@mail.gmail.com>
 <6528707.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <ec6e67fd0609270821r37a03fb9gba9cdd00224d4e2@mail.gmail.com>


I can't use selectors because the message senders do not know which message
consumer is handling their message at any specific time.  I'm really trying
to implement failover.  If my main consumer goes down, I want to failover to
specific consumers in order.

Thanks again.


James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 9/27/06, me9999 <m@wwcw.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.  I would like to clarify something.  If I just
>> have consumers and no message groups can I setup a dispatch policy such
>> that
>> every message goes to one of the consumers unless it is down, then every
>> message goes to another one I specifiy in the dispatch policy, and so on?
> 
> No - we just have exclusive queues...
> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/exclusive-consumer.html
> 
> which acts like all the messages have the same (or no) message group
> header.
> 
> If you want control over what consumers see what messages, maybe you
> need to use selectors?
> 
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dispatch-Policy-and-Message-Groups-tf2342390.html#a6532492
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.