activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Connection pooling
Date Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:26:59 GMT
FWIW there's no need to pool the ConnectionFactory and you only need a
single Connection object (so I guess thats a kind of pooling, just a
really simple pool :) but the session/producer/consumer objects should
definitely be pooled.

On 9/14/06, javaxmlsoapdev <vikasdp@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Absolutely yes. you should use pooling for JMS factory, JMS connection,
> consumers etc. These are expensive resources. look at Jencks for pooling.
>
> petera wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it  advisable to use connection pooling with ActiveMQ connections ?
> >
> > TIA Peter
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Connection-pooling-tf2272704.html#a6313305
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message