activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Co <...@exist.com>
Subject Re: Load Balancing with Single Consumer
Date Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:56:41 GMT
What do you mean it didn't work? Did you get any exceptions?

Could you post the broker and client output/logs?

apinke wrote:
> I did try setting up Multicast as mentioned in this post :
> http://www.nabble.com/broker-discovery-client-help-tf1651573.html#a4474136
>
> but the brokers just sat there and the producer did not send any messages at
> all !
>
>
> Broker X:
> <transportConnector uri="tcp://localhost:61616"
> discoveryUri="multicast://foo"/> 
> and network connector is: 
> <networkConnector uri="multicast://foo"> 
>
> Broker Y:
> <transportConnector uri="tcp://localhost:61617"
> discoveryUri="multicast://foo"/> 
> and network connector is: 
> <networkConnector uri="multicast://foo"> 
>
> The producer used the uri : 
> discovery:multicast://foo
>
> It didnt work. Anything wrong in the config ?
>
> Thanks
> Pat
>
>
>
> Adrian Co wrote:
>   
>> Do you mean having a multicast group of brokers?
>> http://www.activemq.org/site/multicast-transport-reference.html
>>
>> apinke wrote:
>>     
>>> Thanks Adrian..
>>>
>>> We already went through these and did manage to set up a network..the
>>> problem was
>>> 1) the other broker was used only when there was a failover and not as a
>>> load balancer
>>> 2) the other broker needed its own set of consumers.
>>>
>>> What we wanted to try out was if the 2 brokers would load balance but
>>> there
>>> would be only 1 consumer..
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Pat
>>>
>>>
>>> Adrian Co wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Wonder if these is what you are looking for:
>>>> http://www.activemq.org/site/networks-of-brokers.html
>>>> http://www.activemq.org/site/failover-transport-reference.html
>>>> http://www.activemq.org/site/masterslave.html
>>>>
>>>> apinke wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> We are trying to achieve load balancing with single producer and single
>>>>> consumer instance and multiple Brokers.
>>>>>
>>>>> What we are trying to achive is have only one Consumer connect to one
>>>>> broker
>>>>> and listen to a queue but for load-balancing reasons ( or if the broker
>>>>> goes
>>>>> down ) ,  it should automatically connect to the next broker and
>>>>> consume
>>>>> the
>>>>> messages. 
>>>>> Is this setup possible ?
>>>>>
>>>>> To be more clear, can we create a "virtual" broker / queue that a
>>>>> producer
>>>>> and consumer can use , but it is actually composed of a network of
>>>>> brokers ,
>>>>> such that 
>>>>> they can share the load or provide failover capabilities.
>>>>> Of course , this is not load balancing the application but only the
>>>>> brokers...
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Pat
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message