activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Co <...@exist.com>
Subject Re: Load Balancing with Single Consumer
Date Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:55:16 GMT
Do you mean having a multicast group of brokers?
http://www.activemq.org/site/multicast-transport-reference.html

apinke wrote:
> Thanks Adrian..
>
> We already went through these and did manage to set up a network..the
> problem was
> 1) the other broker was used only when there was a failover and not as a
> load balancer
> 2) the other broker needed its own set of consumers.
>
> What we wanted to try out was if the 2 brokers would load balance but there
> would be only 1 consumer..
>
> thanks
> Pat
>
>
> Adrian Co wrote:
>   
>> Wonder if these is what you are looking for:
>> http://www.activemq.org/site/networks-of-brokers.html
>> http://www.activemq.org/site/failover-transport-reference.html
>> http://www.activemq.org/site/masterslave.html
>>
>> apinke wrote:
>>     
>>> We are trying to achieve load balancing with single producer and single
>>> consumer instance and multiple Brokers.
>>>
>>> What we are trying to achive is have only one Consumer connect to one
>>> broker
>>> and listen to a queue but for load-balancing reasons ( or if the broker
>>> goes
>>> down ) ,  it should automatically connect to the next broker and consume
>>> the
>>> messages. 
>>> Is this setup possible ?
>>>
>>> To be more clear, can we create a "virtual" broker / queue that a
>>> producer
>>> and consumer can use , but it is actually composed of a network of
>>> brokers ,
>>> such that 
>>> they can share the load or provide failover capabilities.
>>> Of course , this is not load balancing the application but only the
>>> brokers...
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Pat
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message