Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34899 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2006 12:08:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2006 12:08:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 31284 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2006 12:08:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 31267 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2006 12:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 31246 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2006 12:08:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:08:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:08:48 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so537157uge for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kckWF2hytVDewsiVf3Bm2yAQqhBUWRNkjFchg9ELlOra4dVFFvbI1+cwwNTvVvgWSPsr+K4HdcEEPqpS2MmlpyTeG3Rnf+WLhCRBYbD9QNqfxJCtDIpLnhARwgP1DorkIZzQAHhk0yo65kRZlgGPU0gHNHIP482/8IGO7RdwdPs= Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr2438894ugm; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.243.7 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:08:27 -0400 From: "Hiram Chirino" Sender: chirino@gmail.com To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Compression from provider to consumer In-Reply-To: <5734124.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5734124.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b260d59ebea3b7b8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 8/9/06, jhakim wrote: > > Is compression of payload done only from publisher to JMS provider or all the > way from publisher to JMS provider to consumer? > publisher compresses and the consumer decompresses. Broker just moves around a byte[] payload (he does not care if it's compressed or not). > If the answer is (as I would prefer it to be) that compression of message > body is done all the way from publisher to client, then the follow up Yep. > question is whether or not compression is available (using NMS) if the > publisher is a Java process and the consumer is a C# process. I don't think the C# client supports payload compression and decompression yet. This is one of the reasons that compression is off by default. Anybody know of .NET has gzip compression algorithms included in the platform APIs? > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Compression-from-provider-to-consumer-tf2081319.html#a5734124 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com