Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.204 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=c8SMI8bW4pi8S2HlS5sb2VWPi4nW/lgvFnaoZiyvuWeu5dte07SZcS25SaqtfPDcklFhwF5iZMz47IGB5xEvtSgalyV/iBrtzjqt5pAYLco/oOgBwiqKIOr+DYCFfj+c4K+yzkBFOmANwFU5wFEdx751I3wAcpVQVcUxJYHJFAU=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <E1GCwxM-0008NJ-H7@www33a.your-server.co.za>
References: <E1GCwxM-0008NJ-H7@www33a.your-server.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <70B0FF41-40DB-435F-88DC-8E1917E3E8B3@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kaha IndexItem
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:47:32 +0100
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org

Ah - ok - I'll make sure its backward compatible then :)

cheers,

Rob
On 15 Aug 2006, at 12:19, Mark Ashworth wrote:

> Good Day,
>
> I am using the Kaha Persistence and backward compatibility is a  
> problem.
>
> Regards,
> Mark P Ashworth
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdavies@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 August 2006 01:09 PM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org; ActiveMQ User
> Subject: Kaha IndexItem
>
>
> I'm considering adding an hashcode entry to the IndexItem in Kaha -
> will will improve the performance for retrieving entries in a
> persistent Map. A side-affect will be that this could introduce a non-
> backwards compatible change for anybody currently using the Kaha
> persistent adaptor.
>
>   If anybody sees backward compatibility as an issue (i.e. is anybody
> using Kaha persistence :) ) - please shout!
> I wouldn't envisage this being a change in the release until 4.1 -
> though it would still be possible to upgrade kaha IndexItems to the
> new version on the fly the first time it's run - if folks see this is
> as being a problem ? (ok - I'm trying to get away with being lazy)
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
>
> Rob Davies
> http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>