Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29138 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2006 18:49:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2006 18:49:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 66534 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 18:49:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66397 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 18:49:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66388 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2006 18:49:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:49:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:49:03 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GI8df-0003NP-8a for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:48:43 -0700 Message-ID: <6045290.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: mmitchell To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: spring 2.0 rc3 and xbean incompatibility In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6043598.post@talk.nabble.com> <6044151.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thanks, created Jira issue XBEAN-49. gnodet wrote: > > The 2.6 has just been released, so i guess it will be fixed in 2.7. > Could you raise a JIRA on xbean, please ? > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN > > So, in the mean time, you should revert to spring 2.0-rc2 :( > > On 8/29/06, mmitchell wrote: >> >> >> Even if I upgrade to the xbean-spring 2.6 snapshot it has the following >> incapatibilities: >> >> line: 205 BeanDefinitionHolder definition = >> parserContext.getDelegate().parseBeanDefinitionElement(element, false); >> // >> parseBeanDefinitionElement(Element ele, boolean b) doesn't exist in >> spring >> 2.0 rc3 anymore >> >> line: 581 parserContext.getDelegate().parseListElement(element) // >> parseListElement(element) doesn't exist anymore >> >> and so on. >> >> --Michael >> >> >> >> gnodet wrote: >> > >> > Do you know what are the incompatible changes ? >> > >> > On 8/29/06, mmitchell wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I'm using activemq 4.1 snapshot and xbean-spring 2.5 and trying to >> >> configure >> >> an embedded broker. It seems with the Spring 2.0 rc3 there has been >> >> another >> >> API change. Needless to say, XBeanNamespaceHandler is incompatible. Is >> >> anyone aware of this? >> >> >> >> thanks, Michael >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/spring-2.0-rc3-and-xbean-incompatibility-tf2184957.html#a6043598 >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > Guillaume Nodet >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/spring-2.0-rc3-and-xbean-incompatibility-tf2184957.html#a6044151 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/spring-2.0-rc3-and-xbean-incompatibility-tf2184957.html#a6045290 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.