activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Master/Slave topology in 4.1
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:32:18 GMT
I've updated this page to make it more obvious the difference. I"ve
referred to the non-shared-filesystem/jdbc as 'Pure Master Slave' and
provided a table comparing the different approaches to make it a
little less confusing...

http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html

On 8/21/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/21/06, Ning Li <Ning.Li@businessobjects.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > In this link http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html, it mentioned
> > that "in ActiveMQ 4.1 or later you can use a <masterconnector> ...", but
> > if slave won't replicate master's state, I guess that config element is
> > not needed, right?
>
> That element is not used for JDBC master/slave.
>
> Pure Master/Slave is different to JDBC Master/Slave and Shared File
> System Master/Slave. <masterConnector> only applies to pure
> Master/Slave
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message