activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HA features
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:45:14 GMT
On 8/8/06, superuser <peger@automotive.com> wrote:
>
> We would heavily prefer a shared-nothing architecture, and so for this reason
> are not considering a "shared backend" scenario.
>
> I had not considered a network of Master/Slave brokers, would this look, in
> a two machine configuration, something like:
>
> MACHINE1:
>    MQ-A-PRIMARY
>    MQ-B-BACKUP
>
> MACHINE2:
>    MQ-A-BACKUP
>    MQ-B-PRIMARY
>
> Where backups would be configured as normal and all servers would be
> configured as a network of brokers. Clients would have a connection string
> like
> "failover://(tcp://MQ-A-PRIMARY:PORT,tcp://MQ-B-PRIMARY:PORT,tcp://MQ-A-BACKUP:PORT,tcp://MQ-B-BACKUP:PORT)"
>
> Would this be a minimal HA cluster?

Yes - 4 brokers in 2 master-slave pairs with the broker M/S pairs
store-and-forwarding to each other.


> Incidentally, the "topology" section of the site was not necessarily crystal
> clear as to what a typical configuration would look like. I would think
> something like a list of use-cases, with a diagram of the topology and some
> lniks to .conf files for each would be VERY beneficial.

Agreed. We welcome contributions :)
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/contributing.html

The website is a wiki so anyone can contribute documentation and diagrams..
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/how-does-the-website-work.html

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message