activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Network with slow link
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:45:33 GMT
On 8/8/06, Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@yahoo.se> wrote:
>
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The brokers will create points of failure on the way to the consumers in
> >> B,
> >> so I'll need redundant brokers. How would I configure multiple redundant
> >> brokers in both networks, but still minimizing the number of messages
> >> between A and B?
> >
> > Just run 2 brokers on each side of the slow link so that things will
> > failover if one of the dies?
> >
>
> Yes, that's what we tried. We ran into issues with the brokers not
> re-starting as they should, which I've now reported as AMQ-870.
>
> On a related issue, should AMQ detect message loops? Some documentation says
> that it does, by keeping a list of all visited brokers in each message,

Yes it does.

> while other documentation (for network TTL) warns about the risk of loops
> with a high network TTL.
> We experienced a few message loops when trying out some more complex broker
> network topologies.

If you can create a test case that can reproduce a loop it'd be most helpful.

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message