activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: dose failover have a timeout setting?
Date Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:04:15 GMT
The configuration you are using will only try 2 times to reconnect -
then it will fail with an exception.

If you want it to spend longer reconnecting consider increasing the value of

maxReconnectAttempts=2


On 8/7/06, Matthew Xie <ant_miracle@163.com> wrote:
>
> I use spring JmsTemplate to send jms message to AcitveMQ server. but i found
> a problem that if amq server is not avaible, it will throw exception while
> reconnect timeout.
>
> here's my spring xml configurations:
>   <bean id="jmsFactory"
> class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory">
>         <property name="connectionFactory">
>                 <bean class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory"> <!--
> ;jms.useAsyncSend=true -->
>                         <property name="brokerURL"
> value="failover:(tcp://ip1:61616,tcp://ip2:61616)?randomize=false;initialReconnectDelay=100;maxReconnectAttempts=2;maxReconnectDelay=1000;soTimeout=1000"/>
>                 </bean>
>         </property>
>   </bean>
>
>   <bean id="jmsTemplate" class="org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate">
>         <property name="connectionFactory">
>                 <ref local="jmsFactory"/>
>         </property>
>   </bean>
>
> is there any mistakes ?
> could someone do me a favor? Thx!
>
> Matt.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dose-failover-have-a-timeout-setting--tf2061946.html#a5680259
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message