activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From chanaka <chan...@cboe.com>
Subject Re: Master/Slave topology in 4.1
Date Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:06:26 GMT


What's the mechanism used to select one versus the other, say "pure master
slave" vs "shared file system master slave", assuming there's a shared file
system.

Thanks.

Chanaka



James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> I've updated this page to make it more obvious the difference. I"ve
> referred to the non-shared-filesystem/jdbc as 'Pure Master Slave' and
> provided a table comparing the different approaches to make it a
> little less confusing...
> 
> http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html
> 
> On 8/21/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/21/06, Ning Li <Ning.Li@businessobjects.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the reply.
>> >
>> > In this link http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html, it
>> mentioned
>> > that "in ActiveMQ 4.1 or later you can use a <masterconnector> ...",
>> but
>> > if slave won't replicate master's state, I guess that config element is
>> > not needed, right?
>>
>> That element is not used for JDBC master/slave.
>>
>> Pure Master/Slave is different to JDBC Master/Slave and Shared File
>> System Master/Slave. <masterConnector> only applies to pure
>> Master/Slave
>>
>> --
>>
>> James
>> -------
>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-topology-in-4.1-tf2128538.html#a5928633
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message