activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ning Li" <>
Subject RE: Master/Slave topology in 4.1
Date Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:06:20 GMT
Thanks for the reply.


In this link, it mentioned
that "in ActiveMQ 4.1 or later you can use a <masterconnector> ...", but
if slave won't replicate master's state, I guess that config element is
not needed, right?







-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [] 
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: Master/Slave topology in 4.1


On 8/18/06, Ning Li <> wrote:

> Hi,


> I have a question about JDBC Master/Slave in 4.1.


> In Active 4.0, each broker has its own DB, the Slave has to duplicate

> the states of the Master in order to take over, how about the JDBC

> Master/Slave in 4.1? Does the Slave still duplicate the states of the

> Master, or it just get all the information from DB when it becomes the

> Master, as the brokers share the same DB, all the state can be

> from the DB except some non-persistent messages will get lost.


The latter - the slave just grabs and locks the database that the

master is using.






  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message