Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99863 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2006 13:44:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2006 13:44:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 60270 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2006 13:44:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60255 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2006 13:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 60246 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2006 13:44:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:44:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:44:01 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so277059uge for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:43:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ij9gelWS4arXXZMuYob1NDgfzFzKgFEyWdPHAp36F0gxCbiiQgR6YWfP81DyxHo+hgRCbdFqsdBV/LW1vzNfEhI9vS4oYQvFE6rwSzEGzrJ+BhLGsKVkbG2+j9RZPrBz86fXF1injLK/QOwrwUEDdF+Z2W4K2bdyKaRjGgn8FJE= Received: by 10.78.122.11 with SMTP id u11mr3953340huc; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.174.8 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:43:39 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: jencks or spring 2.0 In-Reply-To: <5521169.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5521169.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 7/27/06, Paul French wrote: > > Now that Spring 2.0 supports MDB which do you use, Jencks or Spring 2.0? There's a comparison here... http://jencks.org/How+does+Jencks+compare+to+Springs+MDPs -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/