Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75256 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2006 17:16:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2006 17:16:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 40115 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2006 17:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 40099 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2006 17:16:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 40090 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2006 17:16:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:16:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.174] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:16:24 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so391332uge for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HRw/xZ8ZMGteniBueT3O5N2JFHs8BVTmubi3LHk3waHHCe28vaXx4S74eYx9diK9QgwUwxIVvarFHrErYmxOvWrZe1nC0f3skqzNsCUFNr3/6Gcc/jS64Yc6o1Q4KD7B3tSMn5z6WQM6dCnirPjN2iJhit81AH+FHlJ95c0m014= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr7477038ugl; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.243.7 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:16:03 -0400 From: "Hiram Chirino" Sender: chirino@gmail.com To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Connection reset by peer: socket write error In-Reply-To: <5515692.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_348209_19183060.1154020563326" References: <5499316.post@talk.nabble.com> <5515692.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: dc295ff8f601e8ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_348209_19183060.1154020563326 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, if the OS can't keep up with the ip packets due to full 100% CPU usage it will start to close sockets. And thus activemq will see jms connections being dropped A better test case would be one that ramps up the load against the server to figure out what the maximum load your hardware can sustain before failures start to happen. To fix this either get more or bigger hardware that will not be 100% CPU pegged. On 7/27/06, Sab wrote: > > > yeah its almost using full CPU time.... > > > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > > how long is it at 100% before you start noticing errors? > > > > can't say exactly its varies run to run.... eg. first run - when i started > from the beginnig the cpu usage is 97-100% and it ran for 5 mins and then > i > got the error.....and in the next run few seconds only got the error... in > that also cpu usage is full..... > > but kindly tell me how it is related to the cpu usage? > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Connection-reset-by-peer%3A-socket-write-error-tf2002588.html#a5515692 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com ------=_Part_348209_19183060.1154020563326--