Return-Path: 
 <activemq-users-return-3289-apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38822 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2006 17:17:46 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2006 17:17:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 16141 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2006 17:17:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16048 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2006 17:17:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:activemq-users-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Id: <activemq-users.geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16039 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2006 17:17:46 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:46 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:45 -0700
Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com)
	by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1G7bOO-0003RL-Vz
	for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:25 -0700
Message-ID: <5580099.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server
In-Reply-To: <ec6e67fd0607310839v62a1c66cwd8930a693032e83e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-Sender: jcarreira@gmail.com
X-Nabble-From: jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com>
References: <5560296.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <ec6e67fd0607300117k3dd823fbyfd39737d5315009e@mail.gmail.com>
 <ec6e67fd0607310839v62a1c66cwd8930a693032e83e@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N



James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> If you set the useDatabaseLock="false" attribute on the
> <jdbcPersistenceAdapter/> element it should disable the use of the
> JDBC exclusive lock and so avoid your problem with SQL Server.
> 
> I've just committed a similar attribute on <journaledJDBC/> as well.
> 

How long does it take for snapshots to come out?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-JDBC-Persistence-with-SQL-Server-tf2022248.html#a5580099
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.