Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42327 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2006 17:33:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2006 17:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 27642 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2006 17:33:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27626 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2006 17:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27617 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2006 17:33:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:33:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:33:13 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1G6WCi-0005do-OI for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:32:52 -0700 Message-ID: <5543890.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT) From: sparky2708 To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: ActiveMQ .NET binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: daa82@columbia.edu X-Nabble-From: sparky2708 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is there a formal release of the .NET binary? I can check it out from CVS and compile it but I am just wondering if that is correct. If there isn't a release schedule will there be one? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-.NET-binary-tf2016637.html#a5543890 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.