Return-Path: 
 <activemq-users-return-3163-apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68600 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2006 03:35:43 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2006 03:35:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 95683 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2006 03:35:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 95664 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2006 03:35:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:activemq-users-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Id: <activemq-users.geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 95655 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2006 03:35:42 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:35:42 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:35:41 -0700
Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com)
	by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1G6J8D-00012F-6T
	for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:35:21 -0700
Message-ID: <5533222.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ with Spring 2.0?
In-Reply-To: <a17839be0607271549y954429eg895d9a2b61d79caa@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-Sender: jcarreira@gmail.com
X-Nabble-From: jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com>
References: <5527075.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <a17839be0607271549y954429eg895d9a2b61d79caa@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


Want to share? ;-)


Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> 
> I'm using Active MQ 4.0.1 with Spring 2.0 but have my own java bean
> wrapper
> for ActiveMQ configuration instead of XBean configuration.
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/27/06, jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anyone using ActiveMQ 4.0.1 with Spring 2.0 ?
>>
>> I've found that the XBean configuration isn't usable, since it apparently
>> depends on an old version of Spring. Here's the error:
>>
>> org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
>> bean
>> with name 'broker' defined in class path resource [jmsContext.xml]:
>> Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/springframework/beans/factory/xml/DefaultXmlBeanDefinitionParser
>> Caused by:
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/springframework/beans/factory/xml/DefaultXmlBeanDefinitionParser
>>        at
>>
>> org.apache.xbean.spring.context.ResourceXmlApplicationContext.loadBeanDefinitions
>> (ResourceXmlApplicationContext.java:87)
>>        at
>>
>> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.refreshBeanFactory
>> (AbstractRefreshableApplicationContext.java:89)
>>        at
>> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(
>> AbstractApplicationContext.java:283)
>>        at
>> org.apache.xbean.spring.context.ResourceXmlApplicationContext.<init>(
>> ResourceXmlApplicationContext.java:64)
>>        at
>> org.apache.xbean.spring.context.ResourceXmlApplicationContext.<init>(
>> ResourceXmlApplicationContext.java:52)
>>
>> Now, since I can't directly bind the "peer://" protocol on a
>> BrokerService,
>> and the BrokerFactoryBean only takes a config location to find the Xbean
>> XML
>> configuration, I'm stuck I guess... Probably have to build my own
>> FactoryBean or something, which means more delays getting set up...
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-Spring-2.0--tf2011356.html#a5527075
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-Spring-2.0--tf2011356.html#a5533222
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.