activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server
Date Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:18:05 GMT
Am not too sure what your XML looks like - but the peer: transport is
typically only used on the client side - there is no server side
transport for peer

On 7/30/06, jcarreira <jcarreira@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, replaced the journaledJDBC with a memoryPersistenceAdapter and I can get
> to the next error:
>
> 2006-07-29 22:48:20,106 [main] ERROR
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService - Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS
> Message Broker. Reason: java.io.IOException: This protocol does not support
> being bound.
> java.io.IOException: This protocol does not support being bound.
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.peer.PeerTransportFactory.doBind(PeerTransportFactory.java:113)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFactory.bind(TransportFactory.java:108)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnector.createTransportServer(TransportConnector.java:245)
>
> I guess I'm not clear on exactly how one uses the peer transport? See my
> config above for how I was trying to use it...
>
> Is it basically the same as setting up the Network of Brokers with multicast
> discovery as shown here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/networks-of-brokers.html
>
> ???
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-JDBC-Persistence-with-SQL-Server-tf2022248.html#a5560343
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message