activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <>
Subject Re: Shutdown hangs
Date Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:36:28 GMT
On 7/25/06, Kuppe <> wrote:
> I feel that our extension of the TcpTransportServer is specific to our
> application. We use this extension to allow us to create our own
> ServerSocketWrapper which performs server side protocol negotiation. We also
> extend the TcpTransport to allow us to create a client SocketWrapper that
> performs the client side protocol negotiation. I think this is a reasonable
> reason to extend the TcpTransportServer, and the opportunity to extend
> correctly is there, i think it just required a little bit more insight into
> the intention of the original implementation. Perhaps i could reuse more of
> the TcpTransportServer also;)

Ah cool, thanks for the heads up.

We're always trying to make ActiveMQ easier to reuse and extend; so if
there's a way to refactor TcpTransport and TcpTransportServer so its
easier to reuse we welcome contributions...



View raw message