activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Firewall HTTP Tunneling performance
Date Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:39:45 GMT
It should do yes as its reusing a servlet engine (often an embedded
Jetty) to deal with the HTTP side of things

On 7/14/06, Aleksi Kallio <aleksi.kallio@csc.fi> wrote:
>
>
> Sounds good! Does it support HTTPS? Can't check out myself, as HTTP is
> not listed in the documentation available from ActiveMQ site.
>
>
> > Yes it can be done.  It's less optimal than TCP, but depending on you
> > message load, you may not notice.
> >
> > On 7/13/06, kj1003 <kokil.jain@lmco.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We are considering using Active MQ for a messaging project. We recently
> >> found out that most of our servers and client will have firewalls and
> >> poking
> >> holes may not be an option. Can ActiveMQ be used to use HTTP Tunneling? I
> >> see some posts but not sure if someone has tried it.
> >>
> >> How bad is the performance and reliability hit if HTTP Tunneling is
> >> enabled?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Firewall-HTTP-Tunneling-performance-tf1938748.html#a5312742
> >>
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message