activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jcarreira <jcarre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ JDBC Persistence with SQL Server
Date Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:16:21 GMT

This isn't some sort of plan to make me look at SwiftMQ is it? ;-)


James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> This looks like the new SQL for the exclusive locks doesn't work for
> SQL Server.  (For more background see....
> http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/jdbc-master-slave.html
> 
> We are basically doing a 'SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK FOR UPDATE"
> which doesn't seem to be allowed for SQL Server despite being SQL 92
> AFAIK..
> 
> I wonder if there's some way to refactor the SQL to make it work
> nicely on SQL Server - or we could maybe allow the exclusive lock to
> be disabled.
> 
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 
> 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-JDBC-Persistence-with-SQL-Server-tf2022248.html#a5564170
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message