Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.214.205 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=hktXneQo8vsKNrfSKsrIa2r0kaA6u41rfzcaIJMDl4OdxAGo47HiQXjSIwdoYZQNvIvSck1t0JCoT3Qsq7Lt6Zpj4oKwJyN7jIoHk4QyV8DMViGQjYQH+XRq9zmbUuxqQvaydund/a1zA7+PJ5paWJd7+LyLbjXTu4uQl5U8OpY=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0606220218p298a14ear1e8027e2f537e152@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:18:30 +0200
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: list transport with vm
In-Reply-To: <4973427.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4973427.post@talk.nabble.com>

sounds like a bug - I wonder do you get the same issue in 4.0?

On 6/21/06, jerb <jerb@bluenotenetworks.com> wrote:
>
> I'm using 3.2 and I get different behavior when creating a connection using
> transport url - "list:(vm://brokername)" than when using "vm://brokername".
> The difference appears to be that the former always creates a new embedded
> broker while the latter will reuse an existing broker. The result is that
> clients intending to use "vm://brokername" as the transport won't be able to
> transmit messages to eachother if one of them was configured in  a list.
> Looking at the code, the reason appears to be that the
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory looks into the brokerContext to check for an
> existing broker connector, while the CompositeTransportChannel does not.
> Why the difference in behavior?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/list-transport-with-vm-t1823631.html#a4973427
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/