Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22658 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 06:33:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 06:33:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 53796 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 06:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53640 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 06:33:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 53623 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 06:33:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:33:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:33:08 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so157635uge for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:32:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dQzaV0kNOUv398q3/8jgy0u/fH60OmBVajQ6YC+xFEz64wn3qKvlb/Tf43+yGfJm05cnbaR6WaKNg0bmeNxYfMY/llZg48iCh2pOKJ3nsK9I1HrC8hOkEoqP9sHy/H7WSVbmOfaDrOsjoaNNzBAmdtWxe6ammcKVjAT8sVqRUWc= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr350635ugl; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.255.17 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:32:46 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Any Successful Production deployment of ActiveMQ? In-Reply-To: <4851078.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4851078.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N We work with lots of customers who have ActiveMQ in production. Off-list I could maybe give you some company names. On 6/13/06, KKS wrote: > > Hello All, > > I wanted to know whether ActiveMQ is robust and reliable enough in a > clustered production environment setting.Any opinions from people who have > deployed it in production will be very helpful. We are thinking of using > ActiveMQ or using commercial ones, although our high preference is for using > only free software(ActiveMQ, JORAM etc) > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Any-Successful-Production-deployment-of-ActiveMQ--t1781579.html#a4851078 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. > > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/