Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82782 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2006 09:10:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2006 09:10:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 41386 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2006 09:10:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41357 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2006 09:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41348 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2006 09:10:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:10:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:10:01 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so1914477uge for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uG2yOBznLiprhM67jB9xYs092foZ7RyM2F4kyeZDhiyDLaoDLvxZg4mANU/adCW1Zj0Zm5dWQGWeOjUIpivsBEoUG52thP1XbnlLIWf7pK57Y+xA3ODKq+rOQ2o2ZX2pFKgh0LIBjC+EiIhdwYYnMhGLR087Dk+dRQAhCqDvNXg= Received: by 10.67.96.14 with SMTP id y14mr4041994ugl; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.255.17 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:09:38 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Web Console with existing AMQ and Jetty In-Reply-To: <4806185.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4806185.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/10/06, ENP wrote: > > Hi, > > Can I use Web Console with existing AMQ and Jetty installations? I see it's > applicationContext.xml but I see only broker bean and no any connections. > > Is Web Console use BrokerService instead of JMX and so I can only embed it > and Jetty in existing AMQ installation? Yes. > Can anybody give me example of this > configuration? Might be able to refactor the wbe console to be able to work remotely using JMX; but for now its easiest to just run the web app and broker as one JVM. The Web Console can use the same XML configuration mechanism that the binary installation uses; so they are pretty quivialent. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/