Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58050 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2006 21:54:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2006 21:54:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 57214 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 21:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 57194 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 21:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 57185 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2006 21:54:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:54:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:54:27 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FtX7m-0003T4-Gj for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:54:06 -0700 Message-ID: <5002278.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:37:57 -0700 (PDT) From: fucema To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Stomp subscribtions are not removed In-Reply-To: <4408539.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: fucema@gmail.com X-Nabble-From: fucema References: <4408539.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Are any of the dev looking into this? I am evaluating the Stomp support in ActiveMQ for deployment in a production environment for integrating ruby,java,python,etc applications. Stomp is the preferred protocol. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stomp-subscribtions-are-not-removed-t1627261.html#a5002278 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.